Integrating Technology

Given the choice between five different models of technology integration: SAMR, TPack, Technology Integration Matrix, Triple E Framework, and Teaching Innovation Progression chart, I decided to do a deeper dive into Technology Integration Matrix or TIM for short. The main reason I chose TIM over the others was because in its simplest form it is designed to evaluate a lesson, as opposed to rating a teacher or judging a task. Whereas the other models, just looked at tasks and not the overall lesson plan. There is so much that can be done and changed at the lesson plan level instead of based on a task. This model of TIM is in its third version and the program is based out of Florida. For more information about the history of TIM follow this link History. 

The Goods of TIM

This model sets the stage for how to use technology at the start of a lesson and throughout as opposed to the after affects like some of the other models. TIM also gives massive amounts of lesson plans, for all different grade levels and subjects. To see videos and lesson plans check out this link Subject Area. Now while it does not go into full detailed lesson plans, it would depend on the state and the standards the teacher is trying to utilize, some tweaking of the provided lessons would need to be done. Something I found very interesting was a side article designed for students, to get them interested in thinking about technology differently than they have before, 8 Great Habits for Learning with Technology.

Where do I fall?

There are five different characteristics of meaningful learning environments: entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion, and transformation. When I think back to my student teaching days, I believe I was in the adoption phase. I understand the use of technology back then, roughly ten years ago, is not the same as it is now in schools, but there was limited access during the week to each class. To see the full chart follow this link, Chart. 

There are also five levels of technology integration to go along with the meaningful learning environments: active, collaborative, constructive, authentic, and goal directed. I think in my current personal and professional life with my use of technology, I fall into the authentic entry level. The description reads as follows: technology use unrelated to the world outside of instructional use. I believe that is where I fall based on how I currently use technology. I rarely ever play around with different types of technology unless it is for a class and when I use the required technology, I am leery of trying new things in the event that it does not work out and I spent all that time for nothing.  

Where do I go from here?

The ideal would be for me to get to goal directed transformation, I fully realize that is not something I can accomplish overnight. It might take me a bit to get there, but I would like to be there in the end. I believe with my current level of activity and use of technology I should be able to get to goal-directed adaptation, which is defined as purposeful use of tools to plan and monitor, some student choice and exploration. As technology continues to grow and change, I will need to more with it so that I, myself do not become obsolete.